Final Words
The fact that the ATI RS350 performed best with an Intel Prescott chipset was quite a surprise. Clearly, chipsets that are optimized for Prescott E chips appear to have the potential to perform better with Prescott than earlier chipsets like the Intel 865/875, which were primarily designed for Northwood operation. If you plan to buy a Prescott Socket 478 processor, the ATI 9100 IGP PRO is a great match to that CPU.On a larger plane, this gives us great hopes for the performance capabilities of upcoming chipsets for Prescott Socket 775. Please keep in mind that RS350 can also be used with Socket 775, so you are also looking at the first Socket 775 chipset to hit the market.
Consider the Prescott/775 perspective just one part of the picture. In all of our tests, the RS350 finally performs about the same as a chipset as the best Intel 865/875 chipsets. This means that the 9100 IGP PRO can be considered an equivalent choice to the Intel 865/875 chipsets - and a preferred choice to the 865/875 with a Prescott CPU. We know that this was where ATI was aiming with RS350, and it certainly appears ATI succeeded in reaching this goal. Performance in every area is improved compared to our earlier tests of the RS300. The memory controller in particular has moved from ho-hum to fully competitive with Intel's best. If you do not overclock your system, then we know that the 9100 IGP PRO will serve you very well as a platform for your Intel CPU - particularly if that processor has a name ending in "E" .
Our concern is what we still don't know about RS350 after looking at the Reference board. There were absolutely no overclocking options at all on the Reference Platform, which is often the case with Reference Boards. While ATI is enthusiastically telling us the overclocking will be great on RS350, we would like to see that for ourselves. There are other competent Pentium 4 chipsets out there besides Intel, namely the SiS655TX and the VIA PT880. However, with the exception of a lone board based on the SiS655TX, they all suffer from poor overclocking performance compared to the remarkable overclocking that we have enjoyed with Intel 865/875 for the past year. This makes all 4 of these boards decent choices for the computer user who never longs to reach new heights with his Pentium 4, but until we see some convincing evidence, Intel is mostly alone at the top in overclocking capabilities.
We are certain ATI is sincere in their claims about the overclocking capabilities of the IGP PRO chipset, and we will join them in proclaiming the RS350 to be an outstanding choice for Intel processors just as soon as we can confirm those promised overclocking numbers.
There are some areas where the RS350 should be your choice regardless of where it goes with overclocking. Now that the performance is equivalent to the 865 as a chipset, there is every reason to choose the 9100 IGP PRO over the Intel 865G, if you are shopping for integrated graphics. As an integrated graphics solution, the 9100 IGP PRO is far superior to Intel's integrated graphics. If you plan to do any gaming at all with an integrated chipset, at least you can function with the RS350, something we cannot say for gaming on the 865G, unless Quake 3 is the only game you will ever play. You can even play Direct X 9 games with the RS350 if you are willing to run at lower resolutions for playable frame rates.
ATI did an excellent job in updating their integrated chipset. The 9100 IGP PRO is now a chipset that you should seriously consider for your next Intel purchase, particularly if that purchase includes a Prescott, or where that purchase will only include integrated graphics. Intel's upcoming 915/925X will likely bring the same performance boost to Prescott, but for now, the RS350 is the only one on the market that shines so brightly with the P4E chips. This time around, ATI's chipset is able to compete with the best on the market. If overclocking lives up to the other improvements in the ATI integrated chipset, then the 9100 IGP PRO will definitely belong on your short shopping list for motherboards for the Pentium 4.
24 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Wednesday, May 5, 2004 - link
My apologies. The chart was supplied by ATI and shows a Clock Speed of 300 and a Ramdac of 400.SocrPlyr - Wednesday, May 5, 2004 - link
The comparison sheet on page 10 definately has 400MHz for the RAMDAC...it is a picture, and pictures don't lie :)
Josh
Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
The comparison sheet on page 10 states the Ramdac speed is 300MHz, exactly what was stated when the review was published. Where is the comparison sheet that states 400 for the Ramdac speed?quanta - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
Are you sure the RAMDAC on 9100 IGP Pro is really 400MHz? The ATI site says it is 300MHz, but the comparison sheet in your site says 400MHz.gofor55 - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
Does anybody know whether 9100IGP Pro will run ATI's Multimedia Center 9.0 and EazyShare. This might be just the ticket for a low cost multimedia PC for living room and bedroom to view PVR captures from a networked media server.Pumpkinierre - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
So Wesley any indications in that ATI note as to how they optimise for Prescott?Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
ATI confirmed SATA RAID was present on RS350, not AOpen. Must have been a petit mal . . .Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
#12 -AOpen has confirmed that RS350 DOES support SATA RAID 0,1. We confiormed SATA RAID works fine with a pair of WD Raptors in a stripe.
The review will be updated to correct the SATA information.
Kai920 - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link
#14 - Very well said.I like how IGPs keep improving --say goodbye to Intel Extreme Graphics 2 and onboard GF4MX. The IGP may very well be a major decision in my future purchases, if not the next.
Wesley Fink - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
#12 -Asute of you to catch the Sata RAID in the diagram. Unfortunately the diagram also shows IXP 300 when the board had an IXP 320.
We have asked ATI for clarification on whether SATA RAID is an option. They are all in Barcelona, Spain for the big X800 kick-0ff tomorrow, so we might not have an answer for a few days.
#10 -
As for the comment about mfg suck-up, GET REAL. Mfgs HOPE they will get a good review from us because we are honest, but more often than not mfgs complain we are too negative in pointing out failings with their product. That means we probably have it about right.
#4 - If you bothered to read the review you would have found the MAIN message was the RS350 competes very well with Intel AS A CHIPSET, which SHOULD be of interest to you. The other news was that Prescott optimizations make Prescott a better performer than Northwood on the new chips. Yes, we coverd Integrated Graphics, because it mattered, but that was not the main point. It wasn't a slow news day - the NDA expired at 6AM today, as the X800 NDA expires tomorrow. The RS350 is a damn good chipset or I wouldn't have bothered.