PAR2 Multithreaded Archive Recovery Performance

Par2 is an application used for reconstructing downloaded archives. It can generate parity data from a given archive and later use it to recover the archive

Chuchusoft took the source code of par2cmdline 0.4 and parallelized it using Intel’s Threading Building Blocks 2.1. The result is a version of par2cmdline that can spawn multiple threads to repair par2 archives. For this test we took a 708MB archive, corrupted nearly 60MB of it, and used the multithreaded par2cmdline to recover it. The scores reported are the repair and recover time in seconds.

Data Recovery - par2cmdline 0.4 Multithreaded

WinRAR - Archive Creation

Our WinRAR test simply takes 300MB of files and compresses them into a single RAR archive using the application's default settings. We're not doing anything exotic here, just looking at the impact of CPU performance on creating an archive:

WinRAR 3.8 Compression - 300MB Archive

3D Rendering Performance Excel & Blu-ray/Flash Creation Performance
Comments Locked

177 Comments

View All Comments

  • blackbyron - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    you don't really understand what I'm talking about. I am not talking about how good AMD is. I'm talking about business. Business is Business. Have you heard about Intel been fined for 1.45 billion dollars because of lawsuit? Intel does something illegal. If you don't believe and not satisfy what I said, google is your friend.

    Are you going get angry that Intel will start at $400 on quad core? Doesn't that make you worry?
  • qwertymac93 - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    it seems a dual core is completely pointless when you can get a quad for a few $ more. any clock speed difference can be made up from overclocking, and power consumption isn't really that much higher. the dual core athlon seems to only have a place in notebooks, were a 10 watt increase can kill any demand for a product. in time the dual cores will fade out and only be seen in notebooks. with phenoms costing twice as much to make, i dont think they even make sense, why not make an 8-core athlon ll for the same die size?
  • maddoctor - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Only AMD worshiper will buy its products. AMD will never win the benchmark. Don't to become an AMD worshiper, get a life and buy Intel powered product.
  • pullmyfoot - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    dude, shut up man. how old are you? 5?
  • maddoctor - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Are you mad? I belive currently you are using Intel based products, and further you will be using Intel products only because AMD will be no more in 2011.
  • vexingv - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Anand's conclusion really sums it up. On the low end, AMD has got it locked. But AMD really has a busy product segment between the Athlon II X2, X3, and X4's. My quandary: I'm giving my current HTPC (AthlonX2 4200+) to my parents and was planning on replacing it with a new Athlon II setup. However, my main PC is an e7200. Now I don't know whether I should go low end (X2 240) for the HTPC or move up a bit (X3 435 or X4 620) and have my old E7200 be the basis of the HTPC and use the AMD system as my new main PC.

    decisions, decisions...
  • maddoctor - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Whatever AMD product throws to market, rubbish is a rubbish. Intel products prices will make AMD's prices room tighter, and AMD is going to sink into oblivion. I love it because Intel prices will be cheaper to consumer.
  • SunSamurai - Sunday, November 1, 2009 - link

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=96&a...">http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=96&a...

    Thats a less expensive AMD CPU out preforming a more expensive Intel CPU

    Suck on that a while.
  • Eeqmcsq - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    AMD has 13 Athlon IIs, 6 energy efficient, 7 normal CPUs, ranging from $60 to $143, with a quite a few overlapping processors. That's not even counting the Phenom IIs in that price range. Some of these might be OEM specific only, so that would simplify the lineup for the individual buyer. Even still, that's a lot of questions the buyer has to face? Faster dual core? Medium triple core? Slower quad core? Energy efficient/low heat? L3 cache?

    I guess one can say there's an Athlon II that will fits anyone's needs at this price range, but figuring out which is the harder part.
  • Ezz777 - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Or stretch your budget to whatever an i5 is going for and get the best of both worlds...

    I'm currently budgeting for a new PC, and i find it hard to justify this sort of price point for a CPU. I'm not strictly Intel/AMD aligned but i just feel the i5 seems to answer most of these questions.

    So...I guess then my question is what sort of budget for a Entry / Mid gaming PC would justify these CPUs?

    And secondly, is there a rule of thumb you all use for what proportion of a PC you should spend on the CPU (or GPU for that matter)?

    Clearly this will change due to the various offerings, but would does 25% CPU, 50% GPU, 25% M/B etc. sound about right?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now