Seasonic M12D 850W: DC-to-DC Perfection?
by Christoph Katzer on November 26, 2008 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
Temperatures, Fan Speed, and Acoustics
The temperature results of the Seasonic M12D are another area where it excels, surpassing most other power supplies. When you compare the temperatures to the increasing speed of the fan, you can clearly see how well the design works. Many other power supplies ramp up fan speed even when it's not necessary, and frequently higher fan speeds and increased airflow barely manage to keep temperatures in check. In contrast, the M12D stays under 50°C at all times; there's a jump in temperature on the secondary heatsink between 20% and 50% load, but it's not enough to actually require a significant increase in fan speed. Once the fan does begin to speed up, however, we immediately see temperatures begin to fall off, showing that the heatsinks are working exceptionally well.
With loads of up to 50%, power output generally stays below 400W and this power supply is virtually silent. Only beyond 50% load is the fan begin to kick in, and as we saw above it does a good job at keeping temperatures in check, reaching a maximum 2300RPM. Seasonic is a bit conservative at higher loads, since the temperatures are still more than reasonable, but they are proud of the engineering that has gone into this design.
At maximum loads and fan speeds of 2300 RPM, it's no surprise that noise levels aren't great. Maximum acoustic noise reaches 31dB(A), which you can definitely hear -- although as usual, creating a load of 850W generally means a lot of noisy graphics card and CPU fans as well. Seasonic prefers to take a conservative approach and avoid overheating, which is good for end-users and component longevity. Given that few users will put such a heavy load on their PSU, however, noise levels of only 17dB(A) at up to 400W are practically undetectable -- it's definitely at the lower boundary of what our equipment can measure. There is however a small ticking noise that can be heard from the heavily undervolted fan, which is common with fans that used normal voltage regulation instead of a PWM controller. (Antec has the patent for PWM controllers in PSUs.)
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
45 Comments
View All Comments
mindless1 - Saturday, November 29, 2008 - link
First of all, in a design like this no they don't produce their airflow at a significantly lower RPM. You've fallen victim to dubious free air ratings, and ignored that lower quality fans tend to increase in noise level sooner due to wear.Second, choosing 140mm fan means you can't pick among many of the good fan makes which the Sanyo Denkis are. Let's just leave a good fan alone instead of replacing it with something junky.
Mr Perfect - Wednesday, December 3, 2008 - link
I'm going by fan testing from SPCR, not the manufacturer's fluff specs. From what they've seen, to hit x cfm rate, a 80mm is going to have to spin faster then a similarly built 92mm, while that 92mm is going to rev higher then a 120mm, and presumably any good 120mm is going to be rotating faster then any quality 140mm at the same real CFM.And cheap fans are definitely not what I was suggesting.
emboss - Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - link
Yes, it's me harping on about ripple and noise again :)There appears to be no ripple in the traces you have shown. The "ripple" figures you quoted are actually noise figures. However, I suspect that the ripple is still there, just overwhelmed by the noise. A low-pass filter to cut off anything more than 1 MHz or so would possibly clean it up and allow ripple numbers to be be determined.
Also, the comparison of 12V1 and 12V2 is just a waste of space. They both come from the same place (they just have independent current limiting, that's all).
jabber - Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - link
This is where I see a future for PSU tech. As more people want to create HTPC/Music Servers I think it would be really good to be able to buy PSUs that deliver high quality, stable, filtered, clean power with the minimum of RFI hash etc.Units would only need to be around the 300-400w mark (could probably get away with 250w).
Would be nice to be able to get stripped down motherboards with traces designed to be as short as possible and ultra quality power circuits to go with them with.
mindless1 - Saturday, November 29, 2008 - link
You are entirely misunderstanding the issues. The power supplied to the system is not directly driving anything where the ripple matters. Voltages are stepped down on the mainboard itself which is a separate more local source of noise, IF that noise would've mattered. A decent audio card will have a linear regulation stage and the digital circuits don't care about a minor bit of ripple.IOW, there is no reason to believe it would make a difference.
Also, stripped down motherboards with short traces also has no point. These are digital circuits while you are thinking in terms of crude analog audio where the traces need be short because the designer didn't properly shield or ground-plane the circuits. Within the analog audio circuits on boards, the traces ARE short, as much so as reasonably possible. Even then, it's drifting the wrong direction since we've had digital output for audio.
Bottom line- all you need is a good audio card with digital output. There will be zero difference which board or PSU you choose so long as they otherwise worked fine.
Mr Perfect - Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - link
ROFL. I'm sure that Monster would be all over that market segment. One thousand dollar 400watt power supplies with gold plated connectors, EMI shielding, and "audiophile grade" filtered power.Granted, clean power is what sets the good power supplies apart from the chaff, but as soon as you step into the music realm, the marketing machine rules supreme.
jabber - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link
Indeed there could be an element of that. However, unlike hifi gear which only gets tested by listening. These components, as they are still PC based would be subject to decent technical testing as per websites such as these.Extravagant claims would soon be put to the test. Unfortunately thats not something that is done quite nearly enough in the audio world.
djc208 - Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - link
Since you've been posting all these great articles on not only PSUs but also energy requirements and effeciency it's really made me look realistically at my system.I picked up a kill-a-watt a few weeks ago and put it on the plugs for my desktop and my server and the numbers I saw completely re-alligned my expectations. Neither of those systems pull over 200W with anything I throw at them. The server isn't high end stuff but has lots of drives spinning and runs 24/7.
The desktop isn't a gaming monster but even plugged into the wall outlet for the UPS I maxed out at about 250W, and that's with the 19" CRT on the same outlet.
So thanks for the education, it's saved me money already. I needed to replace the server PSU and saved money by shopping in the right portion of the spectrum as well as shooting for max efficiency at the wattage I saw vice some bloated "recomendation".
computerfarmer - Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - link
If the 5v and 3.3v draw from the 12V rail(DC to DC) then what does the 40A rating per rail mean? Is this the rating after the draw from the other rails? What is the max amp draw from both 12V rails?The reason for this question came from looking at the specs from "Antec Signature850". See here http://www.antec.com/usa/productDetails.php?lan=us...">http://www.antec.com/usa/productDetails.php?lan=us... This has rail 1&2 at 22A each and Rails 3&4 at 25A each, yet the total is 65A max.
How is anyone supposed to understand these specs?
valdir - Wednesday, November 26, 2008 - link
The ripple measurements need a more severe judgment, since they are higher than, for example, Corsair's TX750 and worst of all, they have a very bad waveform, with very high frequency components.