MediaShield

While the networking side has undergone an extensive makeover, the storage side of the nForce 680i has been fine tuned but the features remain the same as the nForce 590SLI. The nForce 680i SLI series offers three separate SATA controllers each with integrated dual PHYs that are capable of operating at 1.5Gb/s or 3.0Gb/s speeds. This results in six Serial ATA devices being available for the user instead of four as in the nForce4, Intel ICH7/ICH8, or ATI SB600. These devices can be configured in RAID 0, 1, 0+1, and 5 arrays. There is no support for RAID 1+0 although the performance numbers with RAID 0+1 are very similar.


Considering the support for six drives, it is now possible to run a massive RAID 5 drive consisting of a pair of three-drive RAID 5 arrays, or running multiple combinations of RAID technology together. NVIDIA also supports the shared spare (or dedicated spare) technique in MediaShield. The spare disk feature, available with MediaShield RAID 5, offers protection with a dedicated spare drive that can take over for a failed disk until the repair is completed. However, the performance results during our RAID testing found no measurable differences between the nForce4, nForce 590SLI, and nForce 680i SLI storage systems. In fact, the "average" write performance of the nForce4 and nForce 590SLI in RAID 5 continues in the 680i SLI chipset although we still find its performance to be 5% better than the Intel ICH8R.

NVIDIA introduced a new twist to improve their SATA controller performance by offering performance profiles for specific hard drive models in the nForce 590SLI MCP. These performance profiles continue in the 680i SLI MCP. Since each hard drive has unique performance characteristics, NVIDIA matched the capabilities of their controller logic to each drive's particular strength. So far, Western Digital's 150GB Raptor has the only performance profile loaded, but there are plans to profile additional performance oriented drives that are popular in the market. In our testing with dual WD1500 Raptors we noticed benchmark results that were on average about 3% better in our IPEAK tests while the synthetic tests realized a 4% gain in some areas.

While NVIDIA has implemented six native SATA ports in their current MCP55 chipset, they reduced the available native PATA ports to one with support for two drives. This is an improvement over the PATA challenged Intel ICH8 series which requires a separate chipset for PATA support. We firmly believe the reduced number of PATA ports is still a mistake for all chipset manufacturers.

Considering the Optical drive manufacturers have been very slow to implement SATA technology in their drives, this decrease in drive support could affect those users who have multiple optical drives for audio/video content creation and manipulation. However, our discussions with the major optical drive manufacturers show an aggressive transition to SATA technology by the third quarter of 2007.

HD Audio

NVIDIA has finally decided that life after SoundStorm no longer means the continual punishment of users by only offering AC-97 based audio support in their chipsets. As with the nForce 500 lineup, the nForce 600 series will offer full support for the various "Azalia" based High Definition Audio codecs. While the choice of which HDA codec along with the associated circuitry can still greatly impact audio quality and performance, any of these options are better than the AC-97 solutions previously offered.

DualNet, Teaming, and TCP/IP Acceleration NVIDIA Control Panel & nTune 5
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • MikeyC - Friday, November 10, 2006 - link

    I'm looking forward to this. Any idea on when you guys will have the bin numbers for the different rates of OC-ability? I'm planning on OCing my e6600 on this board this weekend; I'll post up my numbers if that'll help.
  • Gary Key - Sunday, November 12, 2006 - link

    We have not figured it out yet. Two CPUs from the same week and they both act differently during overclocking. We are still working with NVIDIA on this matter.
  • Joepublic2 - Friday, November 10, 2006 - link

    965 and 975 boards to my knowledge don't support a FSB/mem ratio smaller than 1:1. Does this chipset have the right multiplier to use DDR2-400 while retaining a 1066Mhz FSB?
  • Gary Key - Friday, November 10, 2006 - link

    The memory settings are sync or async capable on this chipset if you unlink the FSB and Memory in the BIOS. So the answer is yes to your question but believe me this chipset needs good DDR2-800 to get the most out of it. A 1T command rate can make a significant difference in several applications and games. We already found a 4FPS difference in Q4 at 1280x1024 with DDR2-800 at 1T instead of 2T as an example. We will have more on this in our actual board review.
  • Joepublic2 - Monday, November 13, 2006 - link

    I was asking mainly because a conroe board that could run a 4:3 FSB/mem multiplier could be an even better overclocker than the 965. One would only need RAM that could hit DDR 752 for a 500Mhz FSB for example.

    A great review as always!
  • VooDooAddict - Friday, November 10, 2006 - link

    Any idea if there are mATX boards using any of thse new chipsets on the way?
  • Gary Key - Friday, November 10, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Any idea if there are mATX boards using any of thse new chipsets on the way?


    There is the possibility of the 650i Ultra being on a mATX board in late January. However, the suppliers might wait for the new NV Intel IGP chipset coming in Q1. We should have more information in December.
  • BadThad - Thursday, November 9, 2006 - link

    quote:

    However, it should also be pointed out that a second X6800 GPU would not overclock 1 MHz higher


    Should be CPU, the X6800 is not a GPU, lol.
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, November 10, 2006 - link

    Corrected
  • yacoub - Thursday, November 9, 2006 - link

    Do all of the 680i SLi boards require active cooling on the northbridge? That's actually a deal-killer for me, as motherboard fans are about the worst ones out there anymore since they're small, fast-spinning (and due to those two characteristics they are noisy), usually short-lived, and I've yet to see one that is dynamically controlled by the temp of the northbridge.

    I'm guessng 650i boards don't require active cooling, but are any of the 680i boards using a non-reference design sporting completely silent cooling?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now