System Application Performance

We'll start with the typical WinStones and PCMark results, which serve as a general overview of system performance. Unfortunately, the Content Creation test refused to run on the Monarch computer. The Lightwave portion of the test came up with an error every time, but we do have to note that the error appears to be driver/software related. Truth be told, Winstones 2004 is getting old, and it has always been a bit finicky, so we wouldn't worry too much about any "incompatibilities".

System Performance - WinStones 2004

System Performance - WinStones 2004

There isn't much to point out on these charts; all of the results are very close together, and even the faster hard drive in the Monarch system doesn't help out much, at least not in the Winstones tests. In fact, the Shuttle system comes out on top in Winstones Business, so the motherboard and BIOS may be slightly better optimized at this point in time.

System Performance - Futuremark

System Performance - Futuremark

Unlike Winstones, hard drive performance definitely plays a role in the latest PCMark benchmark. Where PCMark04 is a tie in performance for all intents and purposes, the Monarch Revenge comes out with a decent margin of victory in PCMark05. The composite score includes results from multitasking, memory, hard drive, 2D and 3D graphics; while we could go and break down the individual scores, the final score is what people really look at. Just remember that there is a level of abstraction hiding some of the specifics and we'll leave it at that.

Benchmarks Setup Synthetic Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    HDCP support is a graphics/display issue. As has been reported, HDCP is not supported on any current retail graphics cards. It's also not supported under Windows XP. We should start seeing HDCP enabled cards (meaning, with the necessary decryption chip) in the near future. The GPUs are ready, but they still need the appropriate chip soldered onto the boards.

    Personally, I'm really not happy with HDCP at all, so I'm doing my best to avoid it. 1280x720 DivX looks quite nice and runs flawlessly on current hardware. Here's an example from the olympics (18GB compressed to 4.5GB 1280x720):

    http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/multimedia/tvt...">2006 Olympics Men's Hockey Gold Match
  • AGAC - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Hey, what's to love about HDCP. That said, it seems that we just will have to swallow that frog... I mean, DivX does look nice indeed. The problem is availability of mainstream content. I think it's going to be a very cold day in hell before you can walk in the regular video rental and get the latest blockbuster title in beautiful DivX 1280x720.

    DHCP will be broken, we all know that. It only harms the legal user because one will have to upgrade video cards, monitors and god knows what more will not be HDCP compliant. Thanks for the your tip and simpathy. Keep up the good work.

    AGAC
  • DigitalFreak - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    NT

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now