AMD Test Results: Stock 3200+ Speed

The first consideration was the impact of memory speed on stock performance. The 3200+ runs at a speed of 2.0GHz with a stock 10x200 ratio. Performance was compared of the standard 10x200 to 8x250, which is also a processor speed of 2.0GHz. With the CPU operating at the same speed, the only influences on performance are the higher memory speed and the higher bus multiplier.

Standard CPU Speed and Variable Memory Speed
OCZ 3700EB (DDR466) - 1 x 512Mb Double-Bank
Benchmark 3200+ (2.0GHz)
200x10

4xHT 2.5-2-3-10
3200+ (2.0GHz)
250x8

3xHT 3-2-3-10
Super PI
2M Places
100 seconds 97 seconds
Quake 3
FPS
406.5 420.0
Sandra Memory Test
Standard Buffered
INT 3108
FLT 3106
INT 3857
FLT 3857
Sandra Memory Test
Standard UNBuffered
INT 1796
FLT 1819
INT 2183
FLT 2233
UT2003
FPS
Flyby 267.7
Botmatch 103.7
Flyby 270.5
Botmatch 105.7
Aquamark 3
Standard Score Run
43,448 44,056

Slower memory timings were required at DDR500 (250x8) at 3-2-3-10 than the 2.5-2-3-10 needed at DDR400 (200x10). Stock HyperTransport was 4X, and this needed to be lowered to 3X at the 250 multiplier. Despite the slower memory timings at 250x8, you can see that the faster memory speed clearly outperforms slower memory speed with a bit better timings.

AMD Athlon 64 Performance Test Configuration Athlon 64 3200+ Performance Charts
Comments Locked

12 Comments

View All Comments

  • RyanVM - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - link

    What kind of performance impact does dropping the Hypertransport multiplier really have? It would be nice to see a comparision of say HT 1000Mhz @ 5x200Mhz and 4x250Mhz to see just what a difference it really makes.
  • KillaKilla - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - link

    Why are you guys still using the 9800 Pro, as opposed to the X800 XT? Wouldn't you want the entire bottleneck to be as much on the RAM as possible?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now