AMD Test Results: Stock 3200+ Speed
The first consideration was the impact of memory speed on stock performance. The 3200+ runs at a speed of 2.0GHz with a stock 10x200 ratio. Performance was compared of the standard 10x200 to 8x250, which is also a processor speed of 2.0GHz. With the CPU operating at the same speed, the only influences on performance are the higher memory speed and the higher bus multiplier.Standard CPU Speed and Variable Memory Speed OCZ 3700EB (DDR466) - 1 x 512Mb Double-Bank |
||
Benchmark | 3200+ (2.0GHz) 200x10 4xHT 2.5-2-3-10 |
3200+ (2.0GHz) 250x8 3xHT 3-2-3-10 |
Super PI 2M Places |
100 seconds | 97 seconds |
Quake 3 FPS |
406.5 | 420.0 |
Sandra Memory Test Standard Buffered |
INT 3108 FLT 3106 |
INT 3857 FLT 3857 |
Sandra Memory Test Standard UNBuffered |
INT 1796 FLT 1819 |
INT 2183 FLT 2233 |
UT2003 FPS |
Flyby 267.7 Botmatch 103.7 |
Flyby 270.5 Botmatch 105.7 |
Aquamark 3 Standard Score Run |
43,448 | 44,056 |
Slower memory timings were required at DDR500 (250x8) at 3-2-3-10 than the 2.5-2-3-10 needed at DDR400 (200x10). Stock HyperTransport was 4X, and this needed to be lowered to 3X at the 250 multiplier. Despite the slower memory timings at 250x8, you can see that the faster memory speed clearly outperforms slower memory speed with a bit better timings.
12 Comments
View All Comments
RyanVM - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - link
What kind of performance impact does dropping the Hypertransport multiplier really have? It would be nice to see a comparision of say HT 1000Mhz @ 5x200Mhz and 4x250Mhz to see just what a difference it really makes.KillaKilla - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - link
Why are you guys still using the 9800 Pro, as opposed to the X800 XT? Wouldn't you want the entire bottleneck to be as much on the RAM as possible?