Final Words
The fact that the ATI RS350 performed best with an Intel Prescott chipset was quite a surprise. Clearly, chipsets that are optimized for Prescott E chips appear to have the potential to perform better with Prescott than earlier chipsets like the Intel 865/875, which were primarily designed for Northwood operation. If you plan to buy a Prescott Socket 478 processor, the ATI 9100 IGP PRO is a great match to that CPU.On a larger plane, this gives us great hopes for the performance capabilities of upcoming chipsets for Prescott Socket 775. Please keep in mind that RS350 can also be used with Socket 775, so you are also looking at the first Socket 775 chipset to hit the market.
Consider the Prescott/775 perspective just one part of the picture. In all of our tests, the RS350 finally performs about the same as a chipset as the best Intel 865/875 chipsets. This means that the 9100 IGP PRO can be considered an equivalent choice to the Intel 865/875 chipsets - and a preferred choice to the 865/875 with a Prescott CPU. We know that this was where ATI was aiming with RS350, and it certainly appears ATI succeeded in reaching this goal. Performance in every area is improved compared to our earlier tests of the RS300. The memory controller in particular has moved from ho-hum to fully competitive with Intel's best. If you do not overclock your system, then we know that the 9100 IGP PRO will serve you very well as a platform for your Intel CPU - particularly if that processor has a name ending in "E" .
Our concern is what we still don't know about RS350 after looking at the Reference board. There were absolutely no overclocking options at all on the Reference Platform, which is often the case with Reference Boards. While ATI is enthusiastically telling us the overclocking will be great on RS350, we would like to see that for ourselves. There are other competent Pentium 4 chipsets out there besides Intel, namely the SiS655TX and the VIA PT880. However, with the exception of a lone board based on the SiS655TX, they all suffer from poor overclocking performance compared to the remarkable overclocking that we have enjoyed with Intel 865/875 for the past year. This makes all 4 of these boards decent choices for the computer user who never longs to reach new heights with his Pentium 4, but until we see some convincing evidence, Intel is mostly alone at the top in overclocking capabilities.
We are certain ATI is sincere in their claims about the overclocking capabilities of the IGP PRO chipset, and we will join them in proclaiming the RS350 to be an outstanding choice for Intel processors just as soon as we can confirm those promised overclocking numbers.
There are some areas where the RS350 should be your choice regardless of where it goes with overclocking. Now that the performance is equivalent to the 865 as a chipset, there is every reason to choose the 9100 IGP PRO over the Intel 865G, if you are shopping for integrated graphics. As an integrated graphics solution, the 9100 IGP PRO is far superior to Intel's integrated graphics. If you plan to do any gaming at all with an integrated chipset, at least you can function with the RS350, something we cannot say for gaming on the 865G, unless Quake 3 is the only game you will ever play. You can even play Direct X 9 games with the RS350 if you are willing to run at lower resolutions for playable frame rates.
ATI did an excellent job in updating their integrated chipset. The 9100 IGP PRO is now a chipset that you should seriously consider for your next Intel purchase, particularly if that purchase includes a Prescott, or where that purchase will only include integrated graphics. Intel's upcoming 915/925X will likely bring the same performance boost to Prescott, but for now, the RS350 is the only one on the market that shines so brightly with the P4E chips. This time around, ATI's chipset is able to compete with the best on the market. If overclocking lives up to the other improvements in the ATI integrated chipset, then the 9100 IGP PRO will definitely belong on your short shopping list for motherboards for the Pentium 4.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
24 Comments
View All Comments
Cygni - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
"Who that comes to this site give a flying f*ck about integrated graphics""where are the x800 bencharks?? that's what we care about."
"Stop with these goddamn AT sponsor suckup/teaser "ref board" reviews."
First, where the heck did all of these MUTANTS come from? This is AT. Not eXtremeTechOmgFPSAWesome.org.
Second, x800 is under NDA until its launched, for the love of god. Anandtech CANT say anything about it.
Third, LOTS of Anandtech users care about Integrated Graphics. ALOT of the people who come to Anandtech system build for money/pleasure. Just go to the Forums and find out. This is an IT Tech site, NOT a "Gamers Only" site. Hence the server storys, etc.
Finally, I for one enjoy the fact that Anandtech tests boards that most other sites dont have BEFORE they are on the shelf. Anandtech ALSO tests AFTER they are on the shelf to compare. Why WOULDNT they test the board they get sent, to let everyone know? And I like the way you imply that AnandTech only gets pre-release boards because they are sponsored by the company and want a favorable review. You certainly havent been coming here long if you think that.
Myrandex - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
also, what is up with the constant testing of bank interleave set to disabled, doesn't it help memory performance?Myrandex - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
allisolm good job on the empty post. But otherwise, in the article, it is stated that the chipset just supports SATA ports, but in the chipset diagram, it shows RAID 0 and 1 supported. Any clue as to which is right? Also, it is always good to see integrated graphics performance, especially for the reason that many moderately proced laptop haves integrated graphics (not my A64 rad 9600, but still), and it is good to see them approach playable levels.Jason
Pumpkinierre - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Its hard ro understand how you can 'optimise' for a different x86 cpu (nf3 and nVidia Gpus optimisation is a different story) unless they are taking advantage of some of the extra 'secret' X86-64 registers on the Prescott.Bozo Galora - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Stop with these goddamn AT sponsor suckup/teaser "ref board" reviews.
If it aint final - dont look at it.
All this crap is obsolete now anyway in just a few months.
Give me a break.
Talk about a white elephant.
AtaStrumf - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
It was your imagination! It's supposed to come out tomorrow May 4th or on Wednesday May 5th.As for IGP tests: Why the hell not test them? If you dont like it just skip it bitch! I know I was quite interested in the results and I'm sure so were many others.
Nice to see ATi finaly come out with a good chipset (cross your fingers for OC-ing being as good as they say), so that the two GPU giants have now fairly devided the two top CPU manufacturers.
araczynski - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
All i'm saying is it must be a slow day in the news department :)i understand the interest, which i have as well, but in all honesty, anyone concerned about playing games, won't get a system with an IG, and anyone that does, will be disappointed no matter what IG is in there. Whether they get 19FPS or 21FPS, they're not going to be happy.
anyway, where's the x800 stuff? wasn't that supposed to come out first of may? or was that my imagination again.
DAPUNISHER - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
There's a typo on the IGP test config page, it states ATi 865G where it should read Intel.BTW, I'm always very interested in IGP reviews as white box builder a good 80% of my biz is budget IGP systems.
IMHO though, IGP with a $150+ CPU does not equate budget and Celerons won't find a place in my builds unless intel decides to make them more competitive in the sub $100 market vs AMD.
Now, the last thing to answer is wether ATi finally got the overclocking right ;)
allisolm - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
NullSubroutine - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Unlike all these other guys, I do care about Intergrated Graphics...not because I own one (I got A64), but because many people do. Most everyday people buy systems from OEMs like Dell, who sell alot of systems with IGs.Alot of first time users buy systems that are cheap, and sometimes suck. It is nice to see that if someone wants to build a cheap system they can still play any older DX7 games at reasonably high fps and newer DX8.1/9 games at playable 640x480.